Steel hobbit subframe.

Im sick of my center stands wearing threw the aluminum. The idea is use the best features of the mlm, indigan, and joe s. In one steel/cromo package.

Any ideas or inputs? Dont even try wheres my pipe?

DZnSOKeX4AAND38.jpg

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

why not just make sacrificial bushings out of oil impregnated brass or something?

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Totally normal JBOT /

Integrated pipe into swingarm bro do it

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Totally normal JBOT /

I wonder if you could make a steel swingarm that wasn’t as square and bulky as others I’ve seen. Don’t care for their look. Something that is similar to triangulated setups, and you could run a mono shock ooohh

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Beach Club Nick /

> Totally normal JBOT wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder if you could make a steel swingarm that wasn’t as square and

> bulky as others I’ve seen. Don’t care for their look. Something that is

> similar to triangulated setups, and you could run a mono shock ooohh

I feel like way that the rear wheel/transmission mounts is what makes it difficult to do it any other way except square. It could definitely be done, it's just easier to make it a dumb looking box than a cool normal looking swingarm

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

EH 📣FCC of the QCB /

Nick people have made tub style and used flat stock for the mount. It doesn’t have to be a big square block….

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Scottee doesn't know. /

Just throwing ideas that might be in your wheel house.....

Why not a trellis swingarm/subfram?

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Beach Club Nick /

> EH FCC of the QCB wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> Nick people have made tub style and used flat stock for the mount. It

> doesn’t have to be a big square block….

I believe it. I just hadn't seen it. I still think just making a box out of aluminum is the easiest way; like I see why Honda did it like that.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> LSLB RXb wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> why not just make sacrificial bushings out of oil impregnated brass or

> something?

Yeah my concern was it would just wear between the brass and alum. Probably better tho

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> Totally normal JBOT wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder if you could make a steel swingarm that wasn’t as square and

> bulky as others I’ve seen. Don’t care for their look. Something that is

> similar to triangulated setups, and you could run a mono shock ooohh

Im considering a redesign with a longer belt for carb placement and mono is a great idea that would prob pair with that.

But yeah bulky is what i wana avoid i like the trellis style with the hoop at the rear with all the brackets welded inside

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Totally normal JBOT /

Prob with a longer belt is finding one that works well. The 1800treats belt is the pinnacle of hobbit belts. Bx sucks shit. Ax is ok but you lose a lot of variation. So you better plan on making a special longer 15.5mm belt

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

The Honda wallaroo belt would probably work well. It’s the same dimensions as the treats hobbit belt but a little longer. I think the shaft to shaft distance is 2” longer with the wallaroo belt vs the treats hobbit belt. (edited)

26795143-7297-4C36-B927-3E6BE589003F.jpeg

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Joe Schuitema /

I've had good luck with my design over the years. Lots of highspeed runs, crashing, and getting air off railroad tracks. No cracks or bending that I can tell. I really like the added strength of the tube connecting the bracing to the lower engine mounts. However, it's a circus act getting the rear wheel and trans in/out. It can be done, but if there was a way to keep the ends of the swingarm open so the wheel pulls out the back like stock, I'd go that direction. Keeping the bracing low allows me to run the shortest intake possible with big reeds and a tm24.

12633530_10156422077685570_3835490184390278897_o.jpg
12646721_10156422077555570_8108925793828682309_o.jpg
25542490_10159620955605570_8490011939502281028_o.jpg

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> Joe Schuitema wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> I've had good luck with my design over the years. Lots of highspeed

> runs, crashing, and getting air off railroad tracks. No cracks or

> bending that I can tell. I really like the added strength of the tube

> connecting the bracing to the lower engine mounts. However, it's a

> circus act getting the rear wheel and trans in/out. It can be done, but

> if there was a way to keep the ends of the swingarm open so the wheel

> pulls out the back like stock, I'd go that direction. Keeping the

> bracing low allows me to run the shortest intake possible with big reeds

> and a tm24.

> >

wow that is so sick

seriously so robust, i love it

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

I love Joe's design he landed on, but the individual mounting points set into curved tubing really complicates things. It looks fantastic but would be much more difficult to build.

Multiple people have mentioned they would like to have me weld up a custom hobbit subframe but no one has yet to pull the trigger. I've imagined I would build one with a combination of tube and plate.

Just using some pictures from Joes thread as an example, I would cut the individual end plates out of probably 1/4" steel.

moped-army-0c7f68e729eb7f4494df5462c63eb784.jpg

Instead of using more plate to connect the front and back like his original design, I would do something almost identical in the ladder pattern but with thin chromoly tubing.

moped-army-3867cd8a894e4023d2118c6f52860c1f.jpg

Maybe 3/4" .049 wall tube for the top and bottom and 1/2" or 3/8" .035 as the cross ladder bars. Its possible it would be rigid enough to just use .035 wall tube for the whole assembly. Maybe even 3/16 plate instead of 1/4. Anything to cut weight because no matter what that thing is probably gonna be hefty. (edited)

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> Joe Schuitema wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> I've had good luck with my design over the years. Lots of highspeed

> runs, crashing, and getting air off railroad tracks. No cracks or

> bending that I can tell. I really like the added strength of the tube

> connecting the bracing to the lower engine mounts. However, it's a

> circus act getting the rear wheel and trans in/out. It can be done, but

> if there was a way to keep the ends of the swingarm open so the wheel

> pulls out the back like stock, I'd go that direction. Keeping the

> bracing low allows me to run the shortest intake possible with big reeds

> and a tm24.

> >

Yeah im well aware of your build, alot of inspiration been following on YouTube for years

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> - Joe - wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> The Honda wallaroo belt would probably work well. It’s the same

> dimensions as the treats hobbit belt but a little longer. I think the

> shaft to shaft distance is 2” longer with the wallaroo belt vs the

> treats hobbit belt.

Thank you

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> weldwizard Jake wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> I love Joe's design he landed on, but the individual mounting points set

> into curved tubing really complicates things. It looks fantastic but

> would be much more difficult to build.

>

> Multiple people have mentioned they would like to have me weld up a

> custom hobbit subframe but no one has yet to pull the trigger. I've

> imagined I would build one with a combination of tube and plate.

>

> Just using some pictures from Joes thread as an example, I would cut the

> individual end plates out of probably 1/4" steel.

>

> Instead of using more plate to connect the front and back like his

> original design, I would do something almost identical in the ladder

> pattern but with thin chromoly tubing.

>

> Maybe 3/4" .049 wall tube for the top and bottom and 1/2" or 3/8" .035

> as the cross ladder bars. Its possible it would be rigid enough to just

> use .035 wall tube for the whole assembly. Maybe even 3/16 plate instead

> of 1/4. Anything to cut weight because no matter what that thing is

> probably gonna be hefty.

Get out of my head

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Jake basically described exactly what ide like.

Plates for the mounts, trellis tube for the midsection, 3/4 round hoop with the trans mounts inside like joes for the rear.

Use the 2in longer belt and make room for the carb

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

I think 11 ga would be more than strong enough, stock is like 20ga

Smoosh the ends of the tubes in a die and make them slip fit into tabs coming off the plate.

I would put the 1/2" ish offset into the end plates rather than bending the tubes.

I actually put a lot of work into designing this back around 2012 when I had to up and move to NC and lost my shop access. I can see how much of the designs and models I still have. Alex ended up with those reinforcement plates on his TAT hobbit but they needed a lot of massaging to work.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

can I just suggest someone finally put a rear wheel adjustment that isn't just an open slot? Like put a system in place where the wheel position is repeatable. You know, like most bikes came stock with.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Dirty30 Dillon /

Hobbits are great, but the biggest weak link has always been the subframe.

If I was going to redesign this, I would just add soon redesign to include a mid mounted trans that used more available and tunable scooter parts. And bonus: you can use a more accessible standard type wheel.

But back to the point, I agree with Graham on thickness of material, 3/16" is overkill.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> Ryan Go wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> Jake basically described exactly what ide like.

>

> Plates for the mounts, trellis tube for the midsection, 3/4 round hoop

> with the trans mounts inside like joes for the rear.

>

> Use the 2in longer belt and make room for the carb

Like Joe was saying, the one downside to his design is the closed in hoop on the rear makes it so the wheel can't just pull out. Thats why I would consider plates for front and back. If you aren't concerned with that issue then for sure go for it.

Graham, yeah I think 1/8" could probably be alright but I wouldn't go any thinner. It would indeed be cool to slot and bullnose the tubes. We do this at work for some engine mounts, I might even have the dies for 3/4 tube already accessible.

I definitely like Jesse's idea of adding in wheel adjusters.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Totally normal JBOT /

Interesting info on the wallaroo belt. Thank you

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Jake I was gonna say post some pics. When Tyler and I talked about this years ago he sent me a pic of something you guys made that was really nicely done like that.

20220203_143637.jpg

I've seen it done on bicycle frames and stuff like that. You could fillet braze it and make it super nice if you wanted to.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Emil Kniemel /

since going custom i think the use of the longer wallaroo belt to make the longer subframe would be awesome. stretched hobbits always have that giant head to front wheel gap that makes the bike fugly.

maybe its something that people dont even care about but if ur going custom why not.

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

> Graham Motzing wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> Jake I was gonna say post some pics. When Tyler and I talked about this

> years ago he sent me a pic of something you guys made that was really

> nicely done like that.

>

> I've seen it done on bicycle frames and stuff like that. You could

> fillet braze it and make it super nice if you wanted to.

Im already doing this for sp intakes, but yeah ide like to do a hydro upgrade and get dies that arnt homemade

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

Idk why i didn't think of the hoop getting caught i just like the look so much

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

My first die

16439925688526928963772342669529.jpg

Re: Steel hobbit subframe.

I liked the multiple mounts for the shocks, that was kinda clever for an adjustable universal option. And keeping it able to slide out the back wheel easy seems important, especially if you were selling em.

I like graham's idea for easy consistent assembly, clamp pinch the tubing down on the rear plate, I mean- that's exactly how cheap bikes do it, picturing the rear dropouts on a cheap bike, its the rear triangle tubing clamped flat and brazed around the flat plate dropout.

As for belts, kinda the nice advantage is you can adjust the length to fit the belt, you don't have to say +2" and hope there's a belt that matches, you can find a good belt with the right taper and close enough length and match the swingarm to it. Somewhere theres gotta be a good list of available standard belt sizes

Cool shit, Vespa next! Maybe even a design where you can get the engine out easily...

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account