> Graham Motzing Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Brad William Wrote:
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Is it really the case that slip/lubricity/viscosity are the only
>
> > variables to all of the above? I was of the impression that some
> fluids
>
> > were more/less compatible with the clutch pad material itself. Don't
>
> > some formulations, never intended for wet clutch use, deteriorate the
>
> > pads chemically?
>
> so this is pretty complicated because there are a number of different
> materials/chemicals at play. i've never experienced any chemical
> reaction problems from running different oils, but the rubber clutch in
> a Garelli NOI is the big one.
>
> for the most part all of these oils are pretty chemically inert with the
> clutch and seal materials in the transmission. The a35 cork could be
> another one that would be harmed by detergent or solvents in the oil,
> but those probably won't live long enough to need it.
>
> interesting about the rotella in the A35's, i've always ran those with
> ATF because i usually go to asbestos linings on the more powerful ones,
> but i might check that out. i've generally found the oil not to make
> much difference in the tomos motors shifting.
You're right, the spring in 2nd gear is what controls the upshift for the most part..but i have noticed a little bit better slip characteristics with oil instead of ATF, especially when the engine is heat soaked.
The real reason I use atf though is to help preserve the soft countershaft gears, and also help quiet the gear whine a little.
My bike makes a good bit of power, and I use a jammer clutch as well.
I notice less metal flake in my oil changes with actual oil.
When I used to use atf, I noticed burrs forming on the countershaft gear teeth and lots of metal flake.