ciao fasttt

Re: ciao fasttt

250 mph

Re: ciao fasttt

at least, maybe 275 if you duck minimalizing your resistance.

Re: ciao fasttt

seriously..

Re: ciao fasttt

35-37mph.

Assuming you started with a 30mph Ciao in good condition.

Re: ciao fasttt

yeah, other than a kit, thats the 2 main things I can do to make it quicker.

oh and variator, but that just makes accell faster correct? Not top end?

Re: ciao fasttt

also pick up one of the hi-flow air filters.

pipe, carb, filter. the trifecta of non-kitted fast.

Re: ciao fasttt

also, change your fucking author name.

there is one ciao and it is me. serious. ask around.

Re: ciao fasttt

David's right about the name.

The variator would definitely give you better acceleration, but it might give you more top end too....never compared the pulley sizes on a stock ciao to those on a variated bike. I'm sure someone has.

Re: ciao fasttt

i am not actually mad though, you had no way of know this ONE TIME.

Re: ciao fasttt

lol okay. So with those 3 things above It still wont hit 40?

should i go variated? or just stick with non variated.

Re: ciao fasttt

Re: ciao fasttt

you need new cases for sure man that 13mm carb is weak go all the way with either a malossi mhr engine or simonini engine if you want to go stupid fast get a sprocatti motor

Re: ciao fasttt

You can get your Ciao to 50mph without too much work if you kit and get a good pipe, cut the crank and drill the intake to 13mm, and get a smaller rear sprocket. Variating would be good too, though.

But yeah, start with a good pipe (dunno about the ninja, never used one...Simonini makes good ones), a 13mm carb, and a filter. Get it running right and go from there.

Re: ciao fasttt

werd^ hopefully hit 40... and good uphills

Re: ciao fasttt

that full on vespa motor has me drooling!

Re: ciao fasttt

Should I put one of those simo's on my ciao porter?

Re: ciao fasttt

variate, do not hesitate

Re: ciao fasttt

Got a guy here in Ptown pulled 47 easy on his non variated Ciao last night. He sucks off the line though.

Re: ciao fasttt

yeah thats without a reagear yet so ive got room to go on top end too

Re: ciao fasttt

Yeah if you've got hills to deal wth I would variate for sure.

Re: ciao fasttt

yeah i got hills, dunno if i have the money yet to variate it.

Re: ciao fasttt

pipe and carb is where to start. the 13 Sha comes with a 66 jet, works for me at sea level with a Polini pipe (its a bit rich though). Most people go down from there on a stock cylinder. 64ish? stock jet is like a 48 or 50.

Re: ciao fasttt

the main thing you can do to make it quicker is open up the intake and match the ports.

http://www.mopedarmy.com/wiki/Vespa_and_Kinetic_Tuning

Re: ciao fasttt

the 13mm isn't weak at all. its just that the vespa intake diameter is 10 mm. that is what restricts it. if you drill it out to 13mm that carburator will be just fine. personally, on a 50cc or even 65 cc engine, the reed valve intake systems for vespas that use the 21mm carb is overkill. your engine doesn't need that much fuel/air. really i only think you should use the reed valve kits if you go with 70cc or over. and even still it is not nessecary

Re: ciao fasttt

you need a full faring

Re: ciao fasttt

dcc, not to sound like an ass, but you should stop posting and lurk more. 50GP bikes routinely use carbs over 25mm, even up into the 30's. Even drilled out, the 13mm intake on the vespa is the main thing holding these engines back. Mine runs pretty quick on a 13mm, but it would be a lot faster with a 17 or 21. Do you even know what reed valves do?

Anyway, on topic: carb and pipe first, then variate later if you want. Simonini circuit when benji gets them back in stock

Re: ciao fasttt

James, you do not at all sound like an ass. yes i agree. i have these stupid flaws and habits. for instance, i assume waay too much. another thing is i rarely finish anything i start, and not to mention my spelling. I'm sorry if I'm giving out wrong info. i definatly try to regulate my posting.

however, there is some logic behind my answer (at least). This is a street legal moped. not a gp bike. Im not sure about this (but i will tell you I'm not sure) but i think those gp bike s can reach much higher rpms than moderately modified vespa engine, correct me if I'm wrong. Without all these extra rpms, wouldn't it just do bad things to gas mileage?

yes i do know what a reed valve intake is. it is a check valve where when the piston goes up, the vacuum inside the crankcase opens the valve and pulls fuel/ air in. when the piston goes down, the pressure closes the valve so the fuel and pressure doesn't escape back through the carb.

Sorry guys.

Re: ciao fasttt

Good on the reed valves, you nailed it. Yes, the GP bieks are turning much higher RPMs, and are ported more aggressively, but point being a 19 or 21 on a kitted 50 or 65 is fine if you're tuned right. With a cut crank and a good exhaust they will really benefit from the extra mix a large carb would let in.

Re: ciao fasttt

so it doesn't effect fuel efficiency? i guess it wouldn't because the engine is only taking as much fuel as it needs/ wants/ wishes it had.

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account