yeah, I dont think ceramics are the answer. Presently my thoughts are it was either a poorly made crank, or possibly the subframe isnt straight, leading to the shaft spinning at an angle relative to the rear clutch assembly, which would load the bearing axially instead of just radially. I will have to measure the subframe to see if it is straight, and if it isnt Ill have to get my friend to weld up some reinforcements. We'll see.
Re: TOP crank = total crap?
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
TOP crank = total crap?Topic by: James G | James G | 07/12/08 07:31AM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: elliot in England | elliot in England | 07/12/08 08:14AM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: Graham Motzing | Graham Motzing | 07/12/08 12:48PM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: James G | James G | 07/12/08 03:17PM |
Re: VindicatedRe: James G | James G | 07/16/08 04:00PM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: James G | James G | 07/12/08 05:34PM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: Andy | Andy | 07/12/08 11:00PM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: ◕ ‿ ◕ | ◕ ‿ ◕ | 07/13/08 12:55AM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: ottoman | ottoman | 07/13/08 01:34AM |
Re: TOP crank = total crap?Re: James G | James G | 07/13/08 03:33AM |
VindicatedRe: James G | James G | 07/14/08 01:33PM |
Re: VindicatedRe: mike park | mike park | 07/14/08 04:24PM |
Re: VindicatedRe: zachlee | zachlee | 07/14/08 05:23PM |
Re: VindicatedRe: James G | James G | 07/14/08 05:43PM |
Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first: