Re: TROLL ALERT

Miguel /
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.

Dr. Ludwig ... or do you prefer Herr Professor Doktor? I assume you are German, das ist nicht? Allow me to reply to your response regarding my last message. I did not accuse you of using "big words", but rather of being a charlatan. Subsequently, I quite expected you to use "big words" since that seems to be the modus operendi (if not also their modus vivendi) of most charlatans.

Allow me to clarify some of my comments. I did present to you a "world opinion theory." Nor did I intend that you survey would have to include all living humans, let alone those from the past and/or future. I only stated tha a claim of fact which proposes that people, in general, ridicule mopeds and their riders must, to be valid, be supported by evidence. I intended to demonstrate that this evidence is untenable, since it would necessarily require a survey of the opinion of various people's concerning mopeds. Such a moped would have to be representative of the moped-conscious population to be valid. Even if we ignore areas of the world where mopeds are completely (or nearly completely) unknown, a conservative estimate might leave us with, say, 2-3 billion people. We don't have to survey all of them. That would not be a survey, that would be census. Notice the differenc in terminology Herr Doktor. The survey could, in theory include only 1,400 people so long as it was representative. This is the "magic" number normally used in social scientific research techniques. However, survey theory does acknowledge that as the diversity of the population increases, the minimal number necessary to reach a representative survey also increases. This does not even begin to address the question of the validy of the survey instrument (the questionnaire, if you will) itself -- and issue which you yourself also ignored.

Also, in the spirit of responding only to comments you have made, and the added stipulation that you think of yourself as speaking more properly than the rest of us "moped-riding Joes". You claimed in your first post that after "investigation" you came to the "conclusoin" (spelling error here, yours, not mine) that moped riders are "faggots." An interesting turn of a phrase, indeed! Since you seem to present yourself as an Anglophile (that is, using a "British" accent and mannerisms), you would note that "faggot" is not the slang term used for homosexuals (which you, no doubt, intended to imply). Rather, "faggot" is slang for cigarette. Faggot also literaly means a bundle of wood. Did you intend to mean that moped riders are bundles of wood? Or cigarettes? Whatever do you mean, Herr Doktor?!

This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
Subject Written By Posted
  test results are in!!Topic by: Dr. Horatio Wiggly Dr. Horatio Wiggly 01/31/01 03:35PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: anonimous moped rider anonimous moped rider 01/31/01 03:46PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: rasta rasta 01/31/01 04:18PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: tom tom 01/31/01 05:22PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Ron Brown Ron Brown 01/31/01 06:21PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: So sad So sad 01/31/01 07:24PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Dr. Horatio Wiggly Dr. Horatio Wiggly 02/01/01 03:24PM
  Can't Wait!Re: Tom King Tom King 02/01/01 03:59PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: miguel miguel 02/01/01 04:20PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: Brandon E. Brandon E. 02/01/01 05:27PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: Reeperette Reeperette 02/01/01 11:12PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: Professor Luwig von Beauty Professor Luwig von Beauty 02/02/01 01:49PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: DaveB DaveB 02/03/01 08:03PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: Professor Ludwig von Beauty Professor Ludwig von Beauty 02/03/01 08:51PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: Kenneh~ Kenneh~ 07/17/06 04:32AM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Nathan Nathan 07/17/06 08:07AM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Professor Luwig von Beauty Professor Luwig von Beauty 02/02/01 01:31PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: munckinman munckinman 02/02/01 03:10PM
  Re: Can't Wait!Re: Ron Brown Ron Brown 02/02/01 04:27PM
  TROLL ALERTRe: Ryoga28 Ryoga28 02/05/01 01:20AM
  Re: TROLL ALERTRe: Miguel Miguel 02/06/01 01:11PM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Jimmmy g Jimmmy g 02/11/01 03:00AM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Jeff Jeff 07/17/06 11:04AM
  Re: test results are in!!Re: Mrziggz Mrziggz 07/17/06 01:06PM
  The Skeeks have cars!!Re: Brentus Sioux y Cycle Brentus Sioux y Cycle 07/17/06 11:53AM
  Re: The Skeeks have cars!!Re: Jim Jim 07/17/06 04:07PM
  Re: The Skeeks have cars!!Re: tikiman tikiman 07/17/06 04:45PM
  Re: The Skeeks have cars!!Re: Jeff Jeff 07/17/06 05:24PM
  Re: The Skeeks have cars!!Re: Bzenk Bzenk 07/17/06 05:00PM
  Re: The Skeeks have cars!!Re: Nathan Nathan 07/17/06 06:35PM

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account