Very nice bike. In good condition too.
But like the others said, the engines aren't as good as they should be.
Re: Puch X50-3???
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Puch X50-3???Topic by: Silverfox Sullivan | Silverfox Sullivan | 06/19/08 01:33PM |
| Re: Puch X50-3???Re: derek | derek | 06/19/08 01:35PM |
| Re: Puch X50-3???Re: Graham Motzing | Graham Motzing | 06/19/08 01:44PM |
| Re: Puch X50-3???Re: Maitland Of the Loin | Maitland Of the Loin | 06/19/08 01:49PM |
| Re: Puch X50-3???Re: Bort Hoff | Bort Hoff | 06/19/08 01:56PM |
| Re: Puch X50-3???Re: homoped | homoped | 06/19/08 01:57PM |
| Re: Puch X50-3???Re: SchijnHeilig | SchijnHeilig | 06/19/08 02:08PM |
Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first: