Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

I was writing the same info to the umpteenth customer regarding how to get some speed out of a Puch e50 & how the labor ($$$) goes way up when you cross the 8,500 RPM mark - SO I made it into a blog. Hopefully it will help some folks with their builds.

This is the first blog I've written and published without an in house webmaster to proofread, format, and publish for me - so forgive anything goofy.🤣

https://www.detroitmopedworks.com/dmw-puch-e50-basic-upgrades-should-you-build-above-or-below-8500-rpms/

Alex Samul (Owner)

Detroit Moped Works

5407 Michigan Ave

Detroit, MI 48210

E-mail: sales@detroitmopedworks.com

Website: detroitmopedworks.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DetroitMopedWorks/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/detroitmopedworks/

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/detroitmopedworks

Shop Phone # (313) 502-8198 (edited)

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

campeona del mundo /

this is why my go to build is an estoril, 15 bing 44mm or 45mm airsal kit. fast, easy and reliable. you can send them out in the world and they MIGHT not blow up immediately in the hands of a rando (edited)

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

I read your blog and it totally makes sense money wise. I'm gay for scooters (mostly Zuma 2-strokes) and have helped others build their motors. Cheapskates are the best! Expect miracles from the least amount of investment. Plus, they never offer to buy lunch (a cheap pizza for crying out loud) or a case of cheap beer for me wasting half a day tuning. Needless to say I no longer offer to help, and if I get paid for my time its no longer a hobby. But nice breakdown of cost involved.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Nice breakdown, the only thing I can't agree with is the boss pipe! Circuit pipe would be my first choice but on bikes that I don't want to look like they have a grody nutsack, proma GP or even the bullet seems to have a better power band.

I've never bought a clone 15 (that specific one from treats?) Do they have good enough tuning parts in them to run out of the box or do you end up replacing everything? I usually stick to the OEM 14 for that reason.

Sha or nah? I've been meaning to try one on my airsal, you know, for science, but I just can't bring myself to tear apart a rock solid 'perfect loaner' build and I'm sure I'd end up having to jack up the throttle cable which I find distasteful.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

i’m tossed on the 50cc hi-hi head. i dunno what’s going on there, but if you got something good working please let us all know

i actually just set up one of these airsal 65cc kits tonight on an e50 with a stock crank. i can’t wait to see how long it lasts spinning well over 8500rpms :)

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Proma circuit pipe will keep you below 8,500

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

roots to wings /

And I cant wait to hear how you get it above 8,500 to see how an idiot built (me) runs relative to a professionally built one (you). If my gauge is right both mine get to just over 9, but not absolutely positive. The estoril taps out at 44.6 and the cranks at 43.4 based on how they're built right now. They run great to me where I ride.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> roots to wings wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> And I cant wait to hear how you get it above 8,500 to see how an idiot

> built (me) runs relative to a professionally built one (you). If my

> gauge is right both mine get to just over 9, but not absolutely

> positive. The estoril taps out at 44.6 and the cranks at 43.4 based on

> how they're built right now. They run great to me where I ride.

are you running a stock cylinder head on both of your setups?

and you’re using the stock 2 ring piston that the kit comes with, too?

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Boss pipe has no low end and its super loud... but for the price it has amazing build quality and placement. Can't tell you how many baffles i have re-attached on BiTurbo/Bullet/Proma pipes.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Prices seem reasonable to me.

Would it be worth it to sell prebuilt, bolt and go setups with all new hardware?

I’m not in the moped fixing business, I only build race bikes once a year, but I’m curious if selling someone a prebuilt would be less time and more profit (and smaller chance of issues).

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Probably Fred /

> Dickie Thompson wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> Prices seem reasonable to me.

>

> Would it be worth it to sell prebuilt, bolt and go setups with all new

> hardware?

>

> I’m not in the moped fixing business, I only build race bikes once a

> year, but I’m curious if selling someone a prebuilt would be less time

> and more profit (and smaller chance of issues).

Where would they get all the core motors from?

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Probably Fred wrote:

>

> Where would they get all the core motors from?

any established shop is probably sitting on 5-10 e50s at this very moment. i’d put money on it.

and if not, they are truly dime a dozen.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Johnny Braaapp /

Everyone knows the fun only begins at 8500 rpm.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> LSLB RXb wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> > Probably Fred wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Where would they get all the core motors from?

>

> any established shop is probably sitting on 5-10 e50s at this very

> moment. i’d put money on it.

>

> and if not, they are truly dime a dozen.

I have 4-5 bottom ends sitting on a shelf including one or two clamshells.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Stephen Simmons wrote:

>

> I have 4-5 bottom ends sitting on a shelf including one or two

> clamshells.

and you aren’t even a well established shop! UNREAL

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

There's also a rumor that aftermarket e50 cases might be coming soon...

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Mike Boyd wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> There's also a rumor that aftermarket e50 cases might be coming soon...

ALSO UNREAL.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

I could see not pre-building motors because most of the customers would be like: “can I get the number 7, but like… with the number 2 crank and a go-fast piston instead?”

I think the part missing from most reliable builds is the precision. I would love a shop to be tooled up for balancing and alignment and sell me that.

If I buy a crank and kit, they could weigh the reciprocating mass and balance the crank for my horizontal engine. Spin the flywheel, clutch, and bell up to 12,000 rpm on a balancing machine and fix them to be perfect. Key the cylinder to the case somehow so the crank is perfectly centered and no lateral stress is on the con rod bearing for the cylinder being .5mm off to one side.

If all is built to it’s best possible, the limiting factor should be piston rings. At least that’s what I remember from Jennings.

All that said, it’s still probably best to build around that 8.5-10k rpm just for practicality. That’s the target rpm that lets you run a reasonable pipe for a clutch that grabs at survivable rpms. If I had to sell a customer on the idea of “8,500 rpm” I would approach it from the clutch and pipe perspective.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Papa _ wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> I could see not pre-building motors because most of the customers would

> be like: “can I get the number 7, but like… with the number 2 crank and

> a go-fast piston instead?”

>

> I think the part missing from most reliable builds is the precision. I

> would love a shop to be tooled up for balancing and alignment and sell

> me that.

>

> If I buy a crank and kit, they could weigh the reciprocating mass and

> balance the crank for my horizontal engine. Spin the flywheel, clutch,

> and bell up to 12,000 rpm on a balancing machine and fix them to be

> perfect. Key the cylinder to the case somehow so the crank is perfectly

> centered and no lateral stress is on the con rod bearing for the

> cylinder being .5mm off to one side.

>

> If all is built to it’s best possible, the limiting factor should be

> piston rings. At least that’s what I remember from Jennings.

>

> All that said, it’s still probably best to build around that 8.5-10k rpm

> just for practicality. That’s the target rpm that lets you run a

> reasonable pipe for a clutch that grabs at survivable rpms. If I had to

> sell a customer on the idea of “8,500 rpm” I would approach it from the

> clutch and pipe perspective.

OK someone has watched too many two stroke stuffing videos.

with all this talk about balancing reciprocating mass and spinning parts up to 12k on some sort of magic "balancing machine", you've lost sight of even mentioning if the crank is true or not.

you gotta walk before you run, but everyone wants to be a track-star. (edited)

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Mike Boyd wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> There's also a rumor that aftermarket e50 cases might be coming soon...

Heard they may be extra special too…. 🙄

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

True cranks are pretty normal. I check em before they go into my engines.

the one time I pressed a needle bearing con rod into an old crank, it was shit. And I never really got it true. But I would also love if my moped engine builder supply place could verify that as well before assemble.

All I was pointing out is the that ^^those services wild be nice to have for mopeds. Especially since most of us dont have access to the tools or can afford to buy them.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Garrett The Kid wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> > Mike Boyd wrote:

>

> > -------------------------------------------------------

>

> > There's also a rumor that aftermarket e50 cases might be coming

> soon...

>

> Heard they may be extra special too…. 🙄

i hope they actually work for regular e50 stuff and aren't just for case inducted scooter kits.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> LSLB RXb wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> you gotta walk before you run, but everyone

> wants to be a k-star.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Papa _ wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> True cranks are pretty normal. I check em before they go into my

> engines.

>

> the one time I pressed a needle bearing con rod into an old crank, it

> was shit. And I never really got it true. But I would also love if my

> moped engine builder supply place could verify that as well before

> assemble.

>

> All I was pointing out is the that ^^those services wild be nice to have

> for mopeds. Especially since most of us dont have access to the tools or

> can afford to buy them.

oh super cool! what have you deemed acceptable for run out in all 3 directions?

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> LSLB RXb wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

>

> oh super cool! what have you deemed acceptable for run out in all 3

> directions?

I see what you did there.

Yeah, I don’t have a trueing stand so, since the places I buy parts from can’t verify it for me and I can’t afford to send them out, I just plop it in the case and carefully attach something rigid pointing right to the shaft ends. If you turn it over slowly, it’s possible to get the “feeler” to just barely touch and stay the same amount of contact all he way around. If you get a little light through, well then it’s obviously not true.

This isn’t because I can fix it if it’s wrong, but it will let you see if it’s really jacked to begin with.

That was all I was trying to say in the original post. I don’t need, or want, an engine prebuilt for me. But I would pay extra to have things trued, balanced, etc.

If my opinion about this comes off arrogant or something, that’s not my intention.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

> Papa _ wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

>

> I see what you did there.

>

> Yeah, I don’t have a trueing stand so, since the places I buy parts from

> can’t verify it for me and I can’t afford to send them out, I just plop

> it in the case and carefully attach something rigid pointing right to

> the shaft ends. If you turn it over slowly, it’s possible to get the

> “feeler” to just barely touch and stay the same amount of contact all he

> way around. If you get a little light through, well then it’s obviously

> not true.

>

> This isn’t because I can fix it if it’s wrong, but it will let you see

> if it’s really jacked to begin with.

>

> That was all I was trying to say in the original post. I don’t need, or

> want, an engine prebuilt for me. But I would pay extra to have things

> trued, balanced, etc.

>

> If my opinion about this comes off arrogant or something, that’s not my

> intention.

nah, you didn't come off as arrogant. in fact that a pretty neat way to check for how true something might be.

but if we are being 100 percent serious, even an errant mailman can set a crankshaft out of true.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

Many of the early comments on this thread were about my choice to recommend customers run with a Boss pipe which is, admittedly, kind of a dull choice.

I figured I'd expand on that with a pipe review blog.

https://www.detroitmopedworks.com/detroit-moped-works-definitive-guide-to-performance-puch-moped-exhausts/

Check it out and I'll chime in on some of the other comments tomorrow.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

I agree. I never knew how soft they were until I tried to true my own after that conrod swap. I probably pressed it in weird or something. But, to the point, it took very little force to make changes to the play on the end of the shaft.

Made me think twice about using a piston stop to torque on flywheels and clutches. I try to hold the parts now while torquing.

And that’s probably all the more reasoning to keep rpms lower? Because people will be working on their own motors even if they buy something. It wouldn’t be a good thing to build a super precision blueprint motor that can run 12k rpm for days and then the owner pops an impact on the crank nut the wrong direction for .25 seconds and ruins everything.

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

what's up with the 50cc hi-hi head though?

Re: Should you build your Puch e50 above or below 8,500 RPMS?!?

So, I like to try to gear tall at like 18X45 to get the speed from gear rather than from RPM.

BUT with Option A you kind of risk creating a situation where you never get into the pipe to pull the gear. Especially with a larger rider, so the hihi head helps you get off the line a bit quicker and helps avoid a situation where the bike just never hits.

With Option B you don't really need it, but since the bike will be limited in RPM (and heat) by the small stock carb and pipe; so why not give it the extra low end power.

With Option C, I actually usually run a stock head because the bike will already have plenty of power and the low comp head will make it easier to start and it will run cooler (for longevity on the fully kitted bike). I just left it in the bid comparison for consistency between them / to not over-complicate the comparison.

> LSLB RXb wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> what's up with the 50cc hi-hi head though?

.... wait, were you just asking why I run a 50cc head with a 65cc kit? If so, because it's cheaper, always available, seals well, and does not cause any issues.

With standard 50cc & 70cc piston port kits I always run the corresponding sized cheap heads. With reed kits and/or with the larger kits I always run the heads specifically cut for them. The 65cc kits just don't have a good option and 50cc head works fine. (edited)

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account