Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?

Patrick Turner /
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.

> first name last name Wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> > Patrick Turner Wrote:

>

> > -------------------------------------------------------

>

> > > first name last name Wrote:

>

> >

>

> > > -------------------------------------------------------

>

> >

>

> > > Wasn't Pat in charge of shipping and inventory at 77

>

> >

>

> > >

>

> >

>

> > > You can even see Pat in the background of the video being made on

> the

>

> >

>

> > > LTD

>

> >

>

> > I left 1977 in 2009, so plz don’t get it twisted.

>

> >

>

> > I was out of town on the day of Kink’s shoot at the shop.. no

>

> > “backgrounds props” for me.

>

> So you weren't there when the family with three little kids walked in

> the door when they were fornicating on a LTD.

Ok so this guy is actually Crazy Wayne?

This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
Subject Written By Posted
  Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Topic by: Wild Card Wild Card 06/08/18 09:22PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Get Blatzed Get Blatzed 06/08/18 09:39PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bas Autowas Bas Autowas 06/08/18 10:02PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Eugene SWOOP Eugene SWOOP 06/09/18 01:13AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Eugene SWOOP Eugene SWOOP 06/09/18 01:14AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: . . . . 06/09/18 09:36AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: - Dacruzer - - Dacruzer - 06/09/18 03:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Slug Scouten Slug Scouten 06/09/18 04:34PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: scuitar rex scuitar rex 06/11/18 12:22PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bringback2Ts Plz Bringback2Ts Plz 06/09/18 01:53AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/09/18 09:51AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: James Womac James Womac 06/09/18 10:56AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: . . . . 06/09/18 12:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Roger Suarez Roger Suarez 06/09/18 11:03AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/09/18 11:13AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/09/18 11:15AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: James Womac James Womac 06/09/18 12:18PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/09/18 11:35AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: P D P D 06/09/18 11:43AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Drew Willis Drew Willis 06/09/18 01:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/09/18 03:33PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/10/18 09:22AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/10/18 11:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/10/18 12:31PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bob Selby Bob Selby 06/09/18 11:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/09/18 01:54PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Jon Herr Jon Herr 06/09/18 02:25PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bringback2Ts Plz Bringback2Ts Plz 06/09/18 09:17PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/09/18 11:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 07:05PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 07:06PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 10:01AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/19/18 11:04AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/20/18 12:04PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/19/18 11:57AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 12:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/19/18 12:58PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 01:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Fuck your Boys Club Fuck your Boys Club 06/19/18 03:02PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Andrew Squiggman Andrew Squiggman 06/09/18 10:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/09/18 10:49PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Stephen Keller Stephen Keller 06/09/18 11:11PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Charlie BUZZARD Charlie BUZZARD 06/10/18 08:45PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/10/18 08:53PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/11/18 07:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Charlie BUZZARD Charlie BUZZARD 06/18/18 08:08AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 11:29AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/11/18 10:03AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 11:45AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/11/18 11:47AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 11:52AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: P D P D 06/11/18 12:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/11/18 02:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/11/18 03:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/11/18 04:48PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 05:25PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/11/18 01:28PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Don Sumpter (OFMC) Don Sumpter (OFMC) 06/11/18 01:41PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dirty30 Dillon Dirty30 Dillon 06/11/18 11:47AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Josiah Radebaugh Josiah Radebaugh 06/11/18 02:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/12/18 05:33AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/12/18 09:25AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/12/18 05:58AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/14/18 09:21AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Slug Scouten Slug Scouten 06/14/18 09:45AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Fuck your Boys Club Fuck your Boys Club 06/14/18 11:43AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dave & Bummerzz Dave & Bummerzz 06/14/18 11:54AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/14/18 03:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: BLK KWANZAA BLK KWANZAA 06/14/18 05:09PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/16/18 03:24PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dave & Bummerzz Dave & Bummerzz 06/18/18 09:16AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/18/18 06:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/18/18 07:51PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 09:36PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 09:41PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 10:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/17/18 01:08AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bruce Zapper Bruce Zapper 06/18/18 07:35AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: mit mortso mit mortso 06/21/18 02:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/21/18 04:06PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 11:26AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Trent Anderson Trent Anderson 12/04/18 12:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 12:56PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Trent Anderson Trent Anderson 12/04/18 02:04PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 02:22PM

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account