Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?

Born to be WillD /
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.

y'alls conspiracy about MA being complicit is pretty silly. You can constantly find hundreds of complaints on here about shitty people and 77's shitty business.

there is literally no benefit for members or anyone to pretend 77 doesn't suck and try to hide it.

he can't even run a moped business, you think he can run an army of puppet co-conspirators to pull the wool over the masses and keep fleecing them of their moped money?

lol

also "if dos doesn't have it" whatever part you need - email em. They've got everything, lots isn't on the site but they got it and good deals and good ships and service. dos & treats ftw. '77 is toast. fully blown it.

This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
Subject Written By Posted
  Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Topic by: Wild Card Wild Card 06/08/18 09:22PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Get Blatzed Get Blatzed 06/08/18 09:39PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bas Autowas Bas Autowas 06/08/18 10:02PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Eugene SWOOP Eugene SWOOP 06/09/18 01:13AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Eugene SWOOP Eugene SWOOP 06/09/18 01:14AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: . . . . 06/09/18 09:36AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: - Dacruzer - - Dacruzer - 06/09/18 03:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Slug Scouten Slug Scouten 06/09/18 04:34PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: scuitar rex scuitar rex 06/11/18 12:22PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bringback2Ts Plz Bringback2Ts Plz 06/09/18 01:53AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/09/18 09:51AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: James Womac James Womac 06/09/18 10:56AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: . . . . 06/09/18 12:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Roger Suarez Roger Suarez 06/09/18 11:03AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/09/18 11:13AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/09/18 11:15AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: James Womac James Womac 06/09/18 12:18PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/09/18 11:35AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: P D P D 06/09/18 11:43AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Drew Willis Drew Willis 06/09/18 01:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/09/18 03:33PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/10/18 09:22AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/10/18 11:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/10/18 12:31PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bob Selby Bob Selby 06/09/18 11:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/09/18 01:54PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Jon Herr Jon Herr 06/09/18 02:25PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bringback2Ts Plz Bringback2Ts Plz 06/09/18 09:17PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/09/18 11:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 07:05PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 07:06PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 10:01AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/19/18 11:04AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/20/18 12:04PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/19/18 11:57AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 12:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/19/18 12:58PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 01:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Fuck your Boys Club Fuck your Boys Club 06/19/18 03:02PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Andrew Squiggman Andrew Squiggman 06/09/18 10:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/09/18 10:49PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Stephen Keller Stephen Keller 06/09/18 11:11PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Charlie BUZZARD Charlie BUZZARD 06/10/18 08:45PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/10/18 08:53PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/11/18 07:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Charlie BUZZARD Charlie BUZZARD 06/18/18 08:08AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 11:29AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/11/18 10:03AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 11:45AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/11/18 11:47AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 11:52AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: P D P D 06/11/18 12:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/11/18 02:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/11/18 03:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/11/18 04:48PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 05:25PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/11/18 01:28PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Don Sumpter (OFMC) Don Sumpter (OFMC) 06/11/18 01:41PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dirty30 Dillon Dirty30 Dillon 06/11/18 11:47AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Josiah Radebaugh Josiah Radebaugh 06/11/18 02:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/12/18 05:33AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/12/18 09:25AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/12/18 05:58AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/14/18 09:21AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Slug Scouten Slug Scouten 06/14/18 09:45AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Fuck your Boys Club Fuck your Boys Club 06/14/18 11:43AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dave & Bummerzz Dave & Bummerzz 06/14/18 11:54AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/14/18 03:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: BLK KWANZAA BLK KWANZAA 06/14/18 05:09PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/16/18 03:24PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dave & Bummerzz Dave & Bummerzz 06/18/18 09:16AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/18/18 06:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/18/18 07:51PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 09:36PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 09:41PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 10:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/17/18 01:08AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bruce Zapper Bruce Zapper 06/18/18 07:35AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: mit mortso mit mortso 06/21/18 02:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/21/18 04:06PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 11:26AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Trent Anderson Trent Anderson 12/04/18 12:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 12:56PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Trent Anderson Trent Anderson 12/04/18 02:04PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 02:22PM

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account