Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?

. . /
This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.

> Eugene SWOOP Wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> Chances are.. they probably have

> been shielded from the angry masses by certain entities.

they used to be mostly decent, and sometimes shitty. now they seem to be mostly shitty, and occasionally decent.

it used to be that fellow MA folks would defend 1977 vehemently, and bash anyone who posted anything bad about them on the forums. now this is not the case. seems that the old-school MA-ers keep quiet, and the new-school MA-ers are just as vocal about how bad 1977 has become as non-MA-ers were.

it's sad, really. i used to love these guys, because they had weird, cool shit that treats didn't have. they have fucked themselves by treating too many customers as if they don't care about them. when this happens over and over again--especially in a small, insular community such as ours, it may be hard if not impossible to recover.

there have been a few other moped parts outlets who pulled the same kind of shenanigans, and it put them out of business. the only reason 1977 has stayed in business this long is probably because dan has MA connections, and is probably a decent guy IRL. this unfortunately will only get him and his company so far, as we all can see.

i'm still rooting for dan and company to get their shit together and to be an asset to the community once again. however, i'm not overly-optimistic about this happening. it appears that too much damage may have already been done by negligence. once customers no longer trust a company, it's hard to recover in a world where everything they do is visible via a google search.

RIP, 1977 mopeds? i think we all may be seeing the death of this company in the foreseeable future. (edited)

This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
Subject Written By Posted
  Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Topic by: Wild Card Wild Card 06/08/18 09:22PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Get Blatzed Get Blatzed 06/08/18 09:39PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bas Autowas Bas Autowas 06/08/18 10:02PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Eugene SWOOP Eugene SWOOP 06/09/18 01:13AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Eugene SWOOP Eugene SWOOP 06/09/18 01:14AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: . . . . 06/09/18 09:36AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: - Dacruzer - - Dacruzer - 06/09/18 03:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Slug Scouten Slug Scouten 06/09/18 04:34PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: scuitar rex scuitar rex 06/11/18 12:22PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bringback2Ts Plz Bringback2Ts Plz 06/09/18 01:53AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/09/18 09:51AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: James Womac James Womac 06/09/18 10:56AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: . . . . 06/09/18 12:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Roger Suarez Roger Suarez 06/09/18 11:03AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/09/18 11:13AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/09/18 11:15AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: James Womac James Womac 06/09/18 12:18PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/09/18 11:35AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: P D P D 06/09/18 11:43AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Drew Willis Drew Willis 06/09/18 01:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/09/18 03:33PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/10/18 09:22AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/10/18 11:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/10/18 12:31PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bob Selby Bob Selby 06/09/18 11:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/09/18 01:54PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Jon Herr Jon Herr 06/09/18 02:25PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bringback2Ts Plz Bringback2Ts Plz 06/09/18 09:17PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/09/18 11:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 07:05PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 07:06PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 10:01AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/19/18 11:04AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/20/18 12:04PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/19/18 11:57AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 12:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/19/18 12:58PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Patrick Turner Patrick Turner 06/19/18 01:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Fuck your Boys Club Fuck your Boys Club 06/19/18 03:02PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Andrew Squiggman Andrew Squiggman 06/09/18 10:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/09/18 10:49PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Stephen Keller Stephen Keller 06/09/18 11:11PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Charlie BUZZARD Charlie BUZZARD 06/10/18 08:45PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/10/18 08:53PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: David Cox David Cox 06/11/18 07:55AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Charlie BUZZARD Charlie BUZZARD 06/18/18 08:08AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 11:29AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/11/18 10:03AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 11:45AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/11/18 11:47AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 11:52AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: P D P D 06/11/18 12:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/11/18 02:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Derek Cox Derek Cox 06/11/18 03:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Ben Whittle Ben Whittle 06/11/18 04:48PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/11/18 05:25PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/11/18 01:28PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Don Sumpter (OFMC) Don Sumpter (OFMC) 06/11/18 01:41PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dirty30 Dillon Dirty30 Dillon 06/11/18 11:47AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Josiah Radebaugh Josiah Radebaugh 06/11/18 02:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/12/18 05:33AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/12/18 09:25AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/12/18 05:58AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/14/18 09:21AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Slug Scouten Slug Scouten 06/14/18 09:45AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Fuck your Boys Club Fuck your Boys Club 06/14/18 11:43AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dave & Bummerzz Dave & Bummerzz 06/14/18 11:54AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Born to be WillD Born to be WillD 06/14/18 03:15PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: BLK KWANZAA BLK KWANZAA 06/14/18 05:09PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/16/18 03:24PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Dave & Bummerzz Dave & Bummerzz 06/18/18 09:16AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 🇮🇹💦 Of the Loin 06/18/18 06:07PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: jayson sumpter jayson sumpter 06/18/18 07:51PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 09:36PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Probably Fred Probably Fred 06/18/18 09:41PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/18/18 10:43PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: first name last name first name last name 06/17/18 01:08AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Bruce Zapper Bruce Zapper 06/18/18 07:35AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: mit mortso mit mortso 06/21/18 02:21PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Wild Card Wild Card 06/21/18 04:06PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 11:26AM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Trent Anderson Trent Anderson 12/04/18 12:08PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 12:56PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Trent Anderson Trent Anderson 12/04/18 02:04PM
  Re: Is this enough reason to put 77 on the 'bad sellers list/sticky'?Re: Crazy Wayne Crazy Wayne 12/04/18 02:22PM

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first:

Login or Create Account