## Re: off topic.. but...

This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.

I'm a little late on the discussion here, and as a moped newby my opinion may not be worth as much as Don's or Fred's, but as an electrical engineer, I have some expertise here.

An an alternator works on the principle that when a conductive material moves through a magnetic field, it induces current flow. (the coils spinning in a magnetic shell)

A motor works on a similar premise where when a current flows through a magnetic field, it produced a physical force on the conductive material. (charged coils wrapped around a shaft)

These two premises counteract each other.

The current generated by the alternator creates a force which acts in the opposite direction of the force that is driving the alternator (in essence, the alternator turns itself into a motor which wants to turn the opposite direction of the mechanical force that is spinning the alternator).

Because of this, the more current being produced by the alternator, the more physical force is required to turn the alternator (similarly, the more power that is required from an electrical motor, the more current must be supplied to it). If we were dealing with a 100% lossless system (no friction, no electrial resistance, perfect magnetic flux) we would get exactly as much power out (electrical) as is put in (mechanical). But, since this is the real world, you will ALWAYS need to put more mechanical energy into the system than you get out as electrical energy.

I'm not sure how much sense that makes, but it's the result of the first law of thermodynamics (if we want to get really picky, we can throw the 2nd law in as well but it isn't needed at this point)

This single post is part of a larger thread. Start from the top or view this post in context.
Subject Written By Posted
off topic.. but...Topic by: duck 05/02/02 12:18AM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Brandon Eliason 05/02/02 12:34AM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Chucky D 05/02/02 12:56AM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Richard 05/02/02 01:07AM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Ron Brown 05/02/02 11:19AM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: duck 05/02/02 04:29PM
we can do anything, if we had the \$\$Re: InfectedBootSector 05/02/02 05:46PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Spike Bachman 05/02/02 04:57PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: duck 05/02/02 05:40PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: duck 05/02/02 05:42PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Jeremy Hay-Draude 05/03/02 09:25PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Andy 05/02/02 05:49PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: don-ohio 05/02/02 06:11PM
On topic..,Question, Ideas.Re: Wayne 05/02/02 06:43PM
Re: On topic..,Question, Ideas.Re: don-ohio 05/02/02 06:59PM
Patent office (On topic) Free EnergyRe: Wayne 05/02/02 07:00PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: duck 05/02/02 06:12PM
im going to try itRe: duck 05/02/02 06:23PM
Re: im going to try itRe: Ron Brown 05/03/02 10:52AM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Chucky D 05/04/02 04:29PM
Re: off topic.. but...Re: Wayne 05/04/02 04:54PM
ronRe: duck 05/04/02 09:49PM
Re: ronRe: Ron Brown 05/05/02 11:43AM

Want to post in this forum? We'd love to have you join the discussion, but first: